Legislation & Regulation
Legislative and Regulatory Update
May 2016 by Scott Harn
• US District Court rules against Oregon miners
On March 25, 2016, Judge Mark Clarke ruled the State of Oregon can prohibit the use of motorized equipment for instream mining in the name of environmental protection. (Bohmker v. State of Oregon, US District Court, Medford, Oregon, 1:15-cv-01975-CL.)
Judge Clarke stated his decision is not in conflict with the 1872 Mining Act because there is no language in the Mining Act or elsewhere that requires mining to be profitable, and miners are welcome to continue mining with non-motorized equipment.
This decision follows a disturbing trend where judges defer to state and federal agencies regarding what constitutes “reasonable” regulation. And it could very well have a negative impact on the People v. Rinehart case, which is currently under consideration by the California Supreme Court. That case involves federal preemption of state laws and will decide whether or not California can require permits for suction gold dredging—a mining method allowed under federal law—yet refuse to issue such permits.
But before you throw your hands up in disgust and walk away, take a minute to read our “MMAC & PLP Update” in this issue. In that article we lay out the path to getting this situation fixed. We found many sympathetic ears and overwhelming support in Congress during a recent trip to Washington, D.C., and I think your spirits will be lifted again.
• Bill to halt sage grouse management plans introduced
Rob Bishop (R-Utah), Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, has introduced HR 4339, “The Greater Sage Grouse Protection and Recovery Act of 2016.” The bill would give governors the power to reject parts of the federal sage grouse management plans that call for mineral withdrawals or are otherwise inconsistent with state plans.
Chairman Bishop was joined by fourteen co-sponsors.
In the meantime, the Department of Interior is trying to complete their list of areas to withdraw from mineral entry so the agency can publish those withdrawals in the Federal Register in the next few months.
Back in September 2015, the Department of Interior declared that an Endangered Species listing for sage grouse was not warranted, then followed up with an announcement that millions of acres across the Western states would be considered for mineral withdrawals to set aside habitat.
Six lawsuits have already been filed against the Interior’s sage grouse plans and more are expected. The American Exploration and Mining Association stated they are working with Mountain States Legal Foundation and will add their name to the list of plaintiffs soon.

© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article
Additional articles that might interest you...
Legislative and Regulatory Update
August 2016
• Congress heading into summer recess
• Maintenance fees due!
• Congress heading into summer recess
• Maintenance fees due!
Legislative and Regulatory Update
January 2016
• More roadblocks in southern California
• Greater Sage-grouse withdrawals
• More roadblocks in southern California
• Greater Sage-grouse withdrawals
Legislative and Regulatory Update
May 2017
Oregon Senate passes Senate Bill 3
Lawsuit Update From the New 49'ers
December 2012
Many of you are aware that we have been engaged in litigation with anti-mining activists that have been attacking us through the Karuk Tribe of California since 2003. It all started with their lawsuit against the US Forest Service (USFS), challenging that District Rangers do not have the authority to allow small-scale mining activities under a Notice of Intent (NOI) when the Ranger concludes that the mining activity is not likely to create a substantial surface disturbance.
Many of you are aware that we have been engaged in litigation with anti-mining activists that have been attacking us through the Karuk Tribe of California since 2003. It all started with their lawsuit against the US Forest Service (USFS), challenging that District Rangers do not have the authority to allow small-scale mining activities under a Notice of Intent (NOI) when the Ranger concludes that the mining activity is not likely to create a substantial surface disturbance.
Legislative and Regulatory Update
November 2015
• SB 637
• Public land users cry "fowl"
• SB 637
• Public land users cry "fowl"
Legislative and Regulatory Update
September 2017
- PLF sues over critical habitat
- Attorney General ends EPA slush fund
Taking on the EPA, Sasquatch, Ratchilla and Gold Dredging
September 2014
...we packed up our two dredges and headed for our claim about an hour away on the South Fork of the Clearwater to dredge openly in opposition to the EPA.
...we packed up our two dredges and headed for our claim about an hour away on the South Fork of the Clearwater to dredge openly in opposition to the EPA.
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Our Readers Say
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Think You Got It All? Guess Again!
• Nevada's Silver City Gold District -- Part II
• MMAC & PLP Update
• Hard Rock Prospecting With Rusty
• Drywashing in Black Canyon, Arizona
• Progress Continues in Honduras
• Melman on Gold & Silver
• Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices








